Are Believers Little Gods?

Are Believers "Little Gods" Through the New Birth?

In many churches belonging to the Word of Faith movement and the charismatic stream, you will hear a teaching presented with great confidence and enthusiasm. It says: "When you were born again you became of the **God**-kind. Just as a dog gives birth to a dog and a human being gives birth to a human being, so when you were born of **God** you became of **His** kind — a little god, with creative authority to call wealth, health, and blessing into your life with your words and your faith." Some teachers of this doctrine go further still and say: "**God** cannot act in your life without your permission, because you are the one who holds the dominion of this earth as a little god." This teaching is not a marginal idea in this movement — it is the theological backbone upon which the entire system is built, governing everything from prayer and worship to faith, giving, and all practical Christian life.

To examine this teaching we need no advanced academic theology — we need only to read the **Scripture** honestly and ask one question: who first spoke these words in all of human history? When we search honestly and carefully, we find that the very first person to say "ye shall be as gods" was not a prophet of **God**, not an apostle, not any teacher inspired by **His Word** — it was the devil in the Garden of Eden. That discovery alone ought to put us on alert and compel us to examine whatever we are hearing with the greatest care before we receive it as truth.

First: The First Lie — Where This Doctrine Comes From

In Genesis chapter three, after **God** had created the human being and placed him in the garden and given him everything save one tree, the devil — represented in the serpent — stood before the woman and spoke one sentence that altered the entire course of history:

Consider also the manner of the presentation. The devil framed this lie not as an obvious attack but as a revelation — as though **God** had been withholding something that rightfully belonged to the human being. "**God** doth know" — he accused **God** of knowledge-hoarding and envy, suggesting that divinity was something the human could have but was being denied. This framing — that divinity is the human being's right that **God** has unjustly withheld — is precisely the frame repeated today when believers are told they are "of the **God**-kind" and should claim what is theirs. But this is the devil's frame, not **God's**. The new birth does not entitle anyone to what only **God** possesses by right of **His** eternal self-existence.

"Ye shall be as gods" — these four words summarise the little-gods doctrine in its entirety. And what we must pause to consider with the utmost seriousness is that this precise idea — the idea that the human being can become of the same kind as **God** or equal to **Him** — is the very first lie ever spoken in all of human history, and it came from the lips of the devil, not from any prophet of **God**. The devil did not present it as obvious wickedness. He presented it clothed in the language of enlightenment, knowledge, and spiritual advancement. Today it is presented under the cover of "the divine nature," "the believer's authority," "creative power," and "birth from **God**." The packaging changes; the substance does not. This does not mean that everyone who holds this teaching knows its satanic origin — many are sincere believers who received it without testing it carefully against **Scripture**. But it does mean that this idea in its deepest root is sourced from the devil, not from **God's Word**, and that fact demands that we examine it with honesty and humility.

Second: What Does God Declare About His Absolute Uniqueness?

Before examining any text cited in support of this doctrine, we must hear what **God** declares about **Himself** in **His** own written **Word**. **Scripture** repeats this declaration in many forms across hundreds of passages that leave no room whatsoever for doubt or ambiguity:

Consider the precision of these declarations carefully. "Before me there was no **God** formed, neither shall there be after me" — this closes both the past and the future simultaneously, admitting no exceptions. No **God** existed before **Him**, and no **God** shall exist after **Him** — and this includes everything that might be claimed to result from the new birth or from any other spiritual transaction. "There is no **God** beside me" — in any time, in any place, in any dimension of existence. "There is none like me" — no resemblance from any angle, no similarity of any kind. Where, then, does the little god fit into this framework? Nowhere at all. The teaching that deifies believers contradicts directly and explicitly what **God** declares about **Himself** in **His** own inspired **Word** across more than a hundred passages of sacred text.

Third: When a King Claimed Divinity — God's Response in Ezekiel

**Scripture** does not leave us to imagine what **God** would say to one who claims divinity — **He** gives us an explicit and detailed example in Ezekiel 28. The prince of Tyre was an extraordinary king in wealth, wisdom, and political power — exactly the picture that prosperity teaching presents as the fruit of mature faith. But this king's heart lifted itself and he said "I am a god," and **God** sent him a clear and unmistakeable message:

"Yet thou art a man, and not **God**" — this brief and decisive sentence is **God's** complete answer to the little-gods doctrine. It is worth noting that **God** does not explain what the difference between man and **God** is — **He** simply asserts it as a self-evident, irreversible, ontological fact. "Thou art a man." Three words. No qualifications. No "unless you are born again." No "but a little god after the new birth." Just the declaration of an unbridgeable category. Notice that **God** makes no distinction between a great god and a little god. **He** does not say "you are not yet a great god but you may become a little one." **He** says with absolute simplicity and finality: you are a man. The boundary between the human being and **God** is a boundary in essential nature, not in degree, and it is not crossed by the new birth, not by any faith however deep, not by any spiritual experience however genuine. What followed upon this king as judgment for his claim stands as the most solemn warning in all of **Scripture** to every teacher who encourages believers to bear this title.

Fourth: "I Said, Ye Are Gods" — An Honest Reading of John 10:34-35

This is the passage most cited in this debate, and it must therefore be read with the greatest care in its full context, not lifted from it and made to carry more than it says. The **Lord Jesus Christ** here cites Psalm 82 — a psalm addressed to the rulers and judges of Israel who represented **God's** authority in administering justice among the people. **God** called these judges "gods" in a functional and representative sense — His deputies in the act of judgment — not in any sense that touches their intrinsic nature or essential being. The proof of this requires no distant argument; it is found in the same Psalm in verse 7: "But ye shall die like men." Judges called "gods" die as men — because they are men, not actual gods. The **Lord Jesus Christ** used this citation as a logical argument against opponents who accused **Him** of blasphemy for saying **He** is the **Son of God**. **His** argument was: if **Scripture** can call human rulers "gods" in a representative sense without blasphemy, how much more appropriate is it for me, whom the **Father** has consecrated and sent, to say I am the **Son of God**? **He** was not teaching that believers become gods in their nature. And whoever wishes to use this passage as support for the deification of believers must answer honestly: why does the same Psalm that calls these judges "gods" also say that they shall die like men?

Fifth: "Partakers of the Divine Nature" — What 2 Peter 1:4 Actually Means in Context

"Partakers of the divine nature" — a precious and weighty phrase. But the immediate context defines it with precision that leaves no room for the interpretation that proponents of the little-gods doctrine attach to it: "having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust." Partaking of the divine nature means sharing in **God's** moral attributes — **His** holiness, **His** purity, **His** hatred of the corruption that flows from unchecked desire. It is participation in **His** moral character, not identity with **His** ontological essence — the self-existent, eternal, unlimited being that **God** alone is. The difference between these two meanings is foundational and must not be flattened. The believer shares in **God's** moral nature as a child shares certain characteristics with a father, without the child becoming the father in his essential being. **Scripture** makes this relationship clearer elsewhere: **God** predestined **His** own "to be conformed to the image of his **Son**" (Romans 8:29) — conformed in moral likeness and holiness, not united with the divine essence. The faithful believers across all the centuries of the church understood this verse in its proper context, and not one of them dared use it as a basis for claiming that believers become gods in their fundamental nature.

Sixth: "We Are His Workmanship" — Ephesians 2:10 Defines the Believer's Identity

"We are his workmanship" — the Greek word is *poiema*: **His** crafted creation, **His** handiwork. The apostle Paul identifies the believer here not as "a little god" but as **God's** workmanship, **His** created work. The born-again believer is a new creation of **God** — and this is genuinely great and wonderful — but he remains a creation and never becomes the **Creator**. **Scripture** across all sixty-six books maintains this essential distinction between **Creator** and creature without a single exception, and it places the believer always and without exception on the creaturely side of that distinction, however great his grace and however advanced his holiness and however deep his communion with **God**. No new birth, no grace, no spiritual experience however genuine crosses this essential boundary — because crossing it would mean abolishing the monotheism that is the very foundation of **Scripture** from its opening verse to its closing word.

Seventh: The Difference Between "The Image of God" and Being God

**Scripture** teaches that the human being was made "in the image of **God** and after **His** likeness" (Genesis 1:26-27). Proponents of the little-gods doctrine use this truth as evidence that the human being is "of the **God**-kind." But the difference between "being made in the image of **God**" and "being **God**" is the essential, unbridgeable difference between a painting and the painter. The painting bears the image of the painter and expresses something of him — but it is not the painter in any sense. Likewise the human being bears the image of **God** in mind, will, moral capacity, and relational depth — and this is an honour without parallel in all of creation — but this does not make him **God** in his essential being and nature.

**Scripture** also teaches that the image of **God** in the human being was damaged and marred by the Fall — not entirely erased, but profoundly broken. The new birth begins the process of restoring that image in the believer. But it does not transform the human being into **God**. **God** predestined **His** people "to be conformed to the image of his **Son**" (Romans 8:29) — to grow in resemblance to **Christ** in moral purity, holiness, and love. This is the goal **God** has set before **His** people. It is a goal set for a creature by **his Creator** — and it never, at any point in its fulfilment, blurs the essential line between the one who creates and the one who is created.

Eighth: Adoption, Not Divinity — What God Actually Gives the Believer

The apostle Paul draws a clear and explicit distinction between what the believer has received and divinity: **"For ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear; but ye have received the Spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father"** (Romans 8:15). Adoption — not divinity. **"But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God"** (John 1:12) — sons of **God** by adoption and grace, not gods by nature and essence. The difference between these two titles is profound: the adopted child bears his father's name, lives in his father's house, eats at his table, and inherits his estate — but the child differs from the father essentially in nature and being. This does not diminish the depth of the relationship or the honour of the adoption. On the contrary, adoption is among the highest of all the titles **Scripture** bestows upon the believer, and it does not need the addition of "little god" — borrowed from the devil's own words in the garden — to become greater than it already gloriously is.

Ninth: True Worship — Falling Before the Creator, Not Claiming Equality

In every scene of genuine worship in **Scripture** — from Isaiah in the Temple to John on the isle of Patmos — the natural and authentic response to **God's** presence is to fall in reverence and awe, not to stand as an equal or as one of the same kind as **Him**. When Isaiah saw the **Lord** sitting upon **His** high and lifted throne, his response was: **"Woe is me! for I am undone; because I am a man of unclean lips"** (Isaiah 6:5). When the beloved apostle John saw the risen **Lord Jesus Christ** in **His** heavenly glory in the Revelation, he **"fell at his feet as dead"** (Revelation 1:17). Neither of them said "I am a little god of the same kind as you." Both fell. This falling is not weakness — it is the only fitting and authentic response of the creature in the presence of the **Creator's** majesty and holiness. The teaching that convinces the believer he is of the same kind as **God** robs him of this deep and natural response — replacing prostration with presumption, and reverence with demands — and in doing so it damages the very heart of the relationship between the believer and **his God**.

Tenth: The Original Sin — The Desire for Divinity Is an Ancient Root

**Scripture** teaches that the original catastrophe in the history of the cosmos — whether the fall of the angel who became Satan or the fall of the human being in Eden — was bound up with the desire to equal **God** or attain divinity. In Isaiah 14 the fall of Satan is described: **"For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High"** (Isaiah 14:13-14). "I will be like the most **High**" — this is the essence of the original sin: the will to divinity, the craving to be equal with **God**. And in the Garden of Eden, the devil offered the human being this same desire in the same form — "ye shall be as gods" — and the human being ate because he wanted what the lie promised him. The teaching that presents the new birth as a path to divinity offers every believer the original lie in new theological packaging. This is not a harsh accusation — it is what the honest and careful comparison of the biblical texts reveals to anyone willing to read with open eyes.

Conclusion: God Is One Forever — The Believer Is a Beloved Redeemed Son, Not a Little God

"Before me there was no **God** formed, neither shall there be after me" — this truth that **God** himself has declared about **Himself** in **Isaiah** is not overcome by the new birth, not transcended by any measure of faith, not altered by any outpouring of grace. The new birth gives the believer new life, a new moral nature, and a new relationship with **God** grounded in the shed blood of the **Lord Jesus Christ** — and all of this is genuinely great and astonishing and beyond what words can adequately express. But it does not transform the creature into the **Creator** or the human being into **God** — because this would contradict the absolute monotheism declared from the first verse of Genesis to the last verse of Revelation.

The believer who truly understands his genuine biblical position in **Christ** — who has seen the incomprehensible depth of **God's** love expressed in the cross and resurrection of the **Lord Jesus Christ** and received it by faith alone — will find that the genuine titles **Scripture** gives him are astonishing enough to fill a lifetime of contemplation. He is a son of **God** by adoption — an honour never granted to angels (Hebrews 1:5). He is the temple of the **Holy Ghost** — the living **God** dwells within him personally (1 Corinthians 6:19). He is justified — he has stood before the absolute justice of **God** and been declared righteous in **Christ** (Romans 5:1). He is a joint-heir with **Christ** — he inherits the eternal glory of the age to come (Romans 8:17). These titles, all of them genuinely his by the shed blood of the **Lord Jesus Christ**, surpass anything the little-gods teaching claims to offer, and they are his to possess and enjoy and glory in forever. They do not need to be augmented by a title borrowed from the serpent's vocabulary in the garden of Eden.

What **Scripture** gives the believer is incomparably greater than anything the false teaching promises — for the personal knowledge of the true **God** and life in **His** presence and **His** sonship forever is the greatest gift the human mind can conceive or the human heart receive: **"And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent"** (John 17:3). Whoever truly knows the one true **God** does not wish to be **God** — because he has seen **His** greatness, **His** holiness, **His** awesome majesty, and he knows that the most fitting place for him is to worship before this one great **God** forever and ever, with a joy that the false title of little god can never provide and never approach.

Glory to God in our Lord Jesus Christ, for ever and ever and ever. Amen.

The Holy Scriptures address this question with the full authority of the one who inspired them — the living God who knows the human heart and understands every objection before it is raised. What He has said on this subject is not the product of human opinion or denominational tradition; it is the preserved and authoritative Word of God, which He has declared will never pass away. The reader who examines this testimony honestly and without a predetermined commitment to reject it will find it both intellectually satisfying and personally transforming.

The cumulative weight of the biblical evidence on this question is not easily dismissed. It draws on multiple independent witnesses across centuries — the Law, the Prophets, the Psalms, the Gospels, and the Epistles all speak consistently to the same truth, each from its own vantage point and in its own manner, together forming a body of testimony whose coherence is itself one of the strongest arguments for its divine origin. The reader who reads these texts carefully will find not a collection of disconnected religious opinions but a unified revelation with a single coherent message.

← Back to FAQs